[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100617174406.GB3644@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:44:06 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] USB-BKL: Remove BKL use in uhci-debug
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:11:53PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> >From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> >BKL was not really needed, just came from earlier push downs.
>
> >The only part that's a bit dodgy is the lseek function. Would
> >need another lock or atomic access to fpos on 32bit?
> >Better to have a libfs lseek
>
> >Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> [...]
>
> >diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> >index 98cf0b2..b0cf4f8 100644
> >--- a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
> >+++ b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c
>
> [...]
>
> >@@ -539,11 +534,11 @@ static loff_t uhci_debug_lseek(struct file *file, loff_t off, int whence)
> > new = file->f_pos + off;
> > break;
> > }
> >+
> >+ /* XXX: Can size shrink? */
> > if (new < 0 || new > up->size) {
> >- unlock_kernel();
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> Should have dropped {}...
I've fixed that up in the version that got applied.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists