[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30568.1276797848@jrobl>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:04:08 +0900
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>
Cc: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] d_ino considered harmful
David Dillow:
> For example, our main Lustre scratch space has over 285 million files in
> it, and using find -inum takes over 72 hours to walk the tree using
:::
> Using ne2scan -- which uses libext2fs and combines the inode scan and
> the name lookup -- takes over 48 hours to generate a list of candidate
> files for the purge example. With an optimized inode scan and the custom
:::
While I've never heard of ne2scan, I am interested in this simplified
problem such as "find the pathname(s) from an inum in a huge fs."
Is ne2scan essentially equivalent to "debugfs ncheck inum"?
About Valeris's patch, as long as "ls -i" is useful/helpful,
> + /* Use of d_ino without st_dev is always buggy. */
is not true.
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists