linux-kernel - Re: MIPS: return after handling coprocessor 2 exception

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100617190456.GC24162@jni.nu>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:04:56 +0200
From:	Jesper Nilsson <jesper@....nu>
To:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MIPS: return after handling coprocessor 2 exception

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:13:18AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 06:25 AM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:
> >Breaking here dropped us to the default code which always sends
> >a SIGILL to the current process, no matter what the CU2 notifier says.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jesper Nilsson<jesper@....nu>
> >---
> >  traps.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> >index 8bdd6a6..8527808 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> >+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
> >@@ -976,7 +976,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_cpu(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >
> >  	case 2:
> >  		raw_notifier_call_chain(&cu2_chain, CU2_EXCEPTION, regs);
> >-		break;
> >+		return;
> >
> 
> What happens when the call chain is empty, and the proper action *is* 
> SIGILL?

Well, since there is a default notifier installed at the end, it will
correctly return SIGILL.

See the definition of default_cu2_call in the same file.

> David Daney

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
                  Jesper Nilsson -- jesper_at_jni.nu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/