[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617140630.c6ced27a.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:06:30 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: allow restriction of ptrace scope
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:53:49 +0100 Alan Cox wrote:
> > > SELinux users would not need the other LSM, and stacking is thus not
> > > required.
> >
> > But if a user wants to disable ptrace using the SELinux LSM and then
> > also disable sticky-symlinks via the ItsHideous LSM, they're out of luck.
>
> Thats a nonsensical configuration so we don't care. If you are using
> SELinux you just do it via SELinux. If you are doing it via
> UbuntuHasToBeDifferent then you do it via that.
Well, surely there are people who use something other than Ubuntu
and also care about not using SELinux... eh?
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists