linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] procfs: Do not release pid_ns->proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:20:03 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: Do not release pid_ns->proc_mnt too early

On 06/16, Louis Rilling wrote:
>
> Detached tasks are not seen by zap_pid_ns_processes()->sys_wait4(), so
> that release_task()->proc_flush_task() of container init can be called
> before it is for some detached tasks in the namespace.
>
> Pin proc_mnt's in copy_process(), so that proc_flush_task() becomes safe
> whatever the ordering of tasks.

I must have missed something, but can't we just move mntput() ?

Oleg.

--- x/kernel/pid_namespace.c
+++ x/kernel/pid_namespace.c
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ static void destroy_pid_namespace(struct
 {
 	int i;
 
+	if (ns->proc_mount)
+		mntput(ns->proc_mount);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < PIDMAP_ENTRIES; i++)
 		kfree(ns->pidmap[i].page);
 	kmem_cache_free(pid_ns_cachep, ns);
--- x/fs/proc/base.c
+++ x/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2745,10 +2745,6 @@ void proc_flush_task(struct task_struct 
 		proc_flush_task_mnt(upid->ns->proc_mnt, upid->nr,
 					tgid->numbers[i].nr);
 	}
-
-	upid = &pid->numbers[pid->level];
-	if (upid->nr == 1)
-		pid_ns_release_proc(upid->ns);
 }
 
 static struct dentry *proc_pid_instantiate(struct inode *dir,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/