[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617152017.1d939db3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:20:17 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@...et.gr.jp>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] panic: keep blinking in spite of long spin timer
mode
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:36:31 +0900
TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@...et.gr.jp> wrote:
> To keep panic_timeout accuracy when running under a hypervisor, the
> current implementation only spins on long time (1 second) calls to
> mdelay. That brings a good effect, but the problem is the keyboard
> LEDs don't blink at all on that situation.
>
> This patch changes to call to panic_blink_enter() between every mdelay
> and keeps blinking in spite of long spin timer mode.
>
> The default time to call to mdelay is 1ms. It will be switched to
> longer if the CONFIG_PANIC_LONGSPIN_TIMER kernel configuration option
> is enabled. This feature is helpful when running under a hypervisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki@...et.gr.jp>
> ---
> Changes since v2.1:
> - get rid of panicblink= kernel parameter
> - introduce new kernel config option CONFIG_PANIC_LONGSPIN_TIMER
>
I still don't get it :(
Why can't we simply do
for (i = 0; ; i++) {
(*panic_blink)(i & 1);
mdelay(250);
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
on all kernels, regardless of virtualisation, etc?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists