[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1AB152.107@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:35:46 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"ddutile@...hat.com" <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"sheng@...ux.intel.com" <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 12/12] Unplug emulated disks and nics
On 06/17/2010 04:42 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>>> +#if (defined(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND) || \
>>> + defined(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND_MODULE)) && \
>>> + (defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI) || \
>>> + defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI_MODULE))
>>> + printk(KERN_INFO "Netfront and the Xen platform PCI driver have "
>>> + "been compiled for this kernel: unplug emulated NICs.\n");
>>> + xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL_NICS;
>>> +#endif
>>> +#if (defined(CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND) || \
>>> + defined(CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND_MODULE)) && \
>>> + (defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI) || \
>>> + defined(CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI_MODULE))
>>> + printk(KERN_INFO "Blkfront and the Xen platform PCI driver have "
>>> + "been compiled for this kernel: unplug emulated disks.\n"
>>> + "You might have to change the root device\n"
>>> + "from /dev/hd[a-d] to /dev/xvd[a-d]\n"
>>> + "in your root= kernel command line option\n");
>>> + xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL_IDE_DISKS;
>>> +#endif
>>>
>> Wow. Can you move those checks to the header file and make it deal with
>> the #ifdef and setting of xen_emul_unplug?
>>
>>
> I tried, but it didn't improve the elegance of the code, mainly because I
> want to keep the printk in place, so the code would look very much like
> this, but instead of being in platform-pci-unplug.c would be in
> platform_pci.h.
>
What about using Kconfig to define an appropriate symbol and just #ifdef
on that?
>>> + }
>>> + /* Now unplug the emulated devices */
>>> + if (xen_platform_pci_enabled && !(xen_emul_unplug & XEN_UNPLUG_IGNORE))
>>> + outw(xen_emul_unplug, XEN_IOPORT_UNPLUG);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __init parse_xen_emul_unplug(char *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + char *p, *q;
>>> +
>>> + for (p = arg; p; p = q) {
>>> + q = strchr(arg, ',');
>>> + if (q)
>>> + *q++ = '\0';
>>> + if (!strcmp(p, "all"))
>>> + xen_emul_unplug |= XEN_UNPLUG_ALL;
>>>
>> strncmp..
>>
>>
> is it really needed considering that we know that both strings are NULL
> terminated and one of them is a constant?
>
strncmp would avoid having to modify the string in place.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists