[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006162118160.14101@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] oom: unify CAP_SYS_RAWIO check into other superuser
check
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> Now, CAP_SYS_RAWIO check is very strange. if the user have both
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN and CAP_SYS_RAWIO, points will makes 1/16.
>
> Superuser's 1/4 bonus worthness is quite a bit dubious, but
> considerable. However 1/16 is obviously insane.
>
This is already obsoleted by the heuristic rewrite that is already under
review.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists