[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C19A2EE.2010203@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:22:06 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, macro@...ux-mips.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, eike-kernel@...tec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: ioremap: fix wrong physical address handling
On 06/16/2010 07:50 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:30:06AM +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
>> Index: linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.34.orig/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c 2010-06-15 04:43:00.978332015 +0900
>> +++ linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c 2010-06-15 05:32:59.291693007 +0900
>> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
>> static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>> unsigned long size, unsigned long prot_val, void *caller)
>> {
>> - unsigned long pfn, offset, vaddr;
>> - resource_size_t last_addr;
>> + unsigned long offset, vaddr;
>> + resource_size_t pfn, last_pfn, last_addr;
>
> I have a hard time understanding this change. pfn is always a physical
> address shifted by PAGE_SHIFT. So a 32-bit pfn supports up to 44-bit
> physical addresses. Are your addresses above 44-bits?
>
I think they might be. Kenji?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists