[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1276850446.1975.1.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:40:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8] perf: register pmu implementations
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:31 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > @@ -1011,7 +1001,7 @@ static int hw_perf_cache_event(u64 confi
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> > +static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>
> How does power_pmu_event_init ever get called now? I don't see any
> other references to it in the patch. Should struct pmu have a
> reference to it?
Uhm yeah.. looks like that went pear-shaped. Fixed it.
---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1125,6 +1125,7 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct p
}
struct pmu power_pmu = {
+ .event_init = power_pmu_event_init,
.enable = power_pmu_enable,
.disable = power_pmu_disable,
.read = power_pmu_read,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists