[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-0bdd2ed4138ec04e09b4f8165981efc99e439f55@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:20:45 GMT
From: tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()
Commit-ID: 0bdd2ed4138ec04e09b4f8165981efc99e439f55
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/0bdd2ed4138ec04e09b4f8165981efc99e439f55
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:10:18 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:46:57 +0200
sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()
run_posix_cpu_timers() doesn't work if current has already passed
exit_notify(). This was needed to prevent the races with do_wait().
Since ea6d290c ->signal is always valid and can't go away. We can
remove the "tsk->exit_state == 0" in fastpath_timer_check() and
convert run_posix_cpu_timers() to use lock_task_sighand().
Note: it makes sense to take group_leader's sighand instead, the
sub-thread still uses CPU after release_task(). But we need more
changes to do this.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100610231018.GA25942@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 10 ++++------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index bf2a650..d5dbef5 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1272,10 +1272,6 @@ static inline int fastpath_timer_check(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
struct signal_struct *sig;
- /* tsk == current, ensure it is safe to use ->signal/sighand */
- if (unlikely(tsk->exit_state))
- return 0;
-
if (!task_cputime_zero(&tsk->cputime_expires)) {
struct task_cputime task_sample = {
.utime = tsk->utime,
@@ -1308,6 +1304,7 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
LIST_HEAD(firing);
struct k_itimer *timer, *next;
+ unsigned long flags;
BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
@@ -1318,7 +1315,8 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(struct task_struct *tsk)
if (!fastpath_timer_check(tsk))
return;
- spin_lock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
+ if (!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags))
+ return;
/*
* Here we take off tsk->signal->cpu_timers[N] and
* tsk->cpu_timers[N] all the timers that are firing, and
@@ -1340,7 +1338,7 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(struct task_struct *tsk)
* that gets the timer lock before we do will give it up and
* spin until we've taken care of that timer below.
*/
- spin_unlock(&tsk->sighand->siglock);
+ unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
/*
* Now that all the timers on our list have the firing flag,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists