[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1B537F.30300@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:07:43 +0100
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
CC: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matthew@....cx, macro@...ux-mips.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, eike-kernel@...tec.de,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: ioremap: fix wrong physical address handling
On 06/18/2010 04:22 AM, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Current x86 ioremap() doesn't handle physical address higher than
> 32-bit properly in X86_32 PAE mode. When physical address higher than
> 32-bit is passed to ioremap(), higher 32-bits in physical address is
> cleared wrongly. Due to this bug, ioremap() can map wrong address to
> linear address space.
>
> In my case, 64-bit MMIO region was assigned to a PCI device (ioat
> device) on my system. Because of the ioremap()'s bug, wrong physical
> address (instead of MMIO region) was mapped to linear address space.
> Because of this, loading ioatdma driver caused unexpected behavior
> (kernel panic, kernel hangup, ...).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 12 +++++-------
> include/linux/io.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 2 +-
> lib/ioremap.c | 10 +++++-----
> mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.34.orig/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ linux-2.6.34/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ int ioremap_change_attr(unsigned long va
> static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> unsigned long size, unsigned long prot_val, void *caller)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn, offset, vaddr;
> - resource_size_t last_addr;
> + unsigned long offset, vaddr;
> + resource_size_t pfn, last_pfn, last_addr;
>
Why is pfn resource_size_t here? Is it to avoid casting, or does it
actually need to hold more than 32 bits? I don't see any use of pfn
aside from the page_is_ram loop, and I don't think that can go beyond 32
bits. If you're worried about boundary conditions at the 2^44 limit,
then you can make last_pfn inclusive, or compute num_pages and use that
for the loop condition.
> const resource_size_t unaligned_phys_addr = phys_addr;
> const unsigned long unaligned_size = size;
> struct vm_struct *area;
> @@ -100,10 +100,8 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(re
> /*
> * Don't allow anybody to remap normal RAM that we're using..
> */
> - for (pfn = phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) < (last_addr & PAGE_MASK);
> - pfn++) {
> -
> + last_pfn = last_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
If last_addr can be non-page aligned, should it be rounding up to the
next pfn rather than rounding down? Ah, looks like you fix it in the
second patch.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists