[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100618021405.GD5345@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 04:14:07 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] perf: Per PMU disable
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 06:00:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static void armpmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> +static void powerpc_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> +static void fsl_emb_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> +static void sh_pmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +static void sparc_pmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> +static void x86_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
These namings are really bad. Why not just using pmu once
in each names? x86_pmu_enable, etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists