[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100618172121.528f2e09@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:21:21 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: avoid recursive BTM in pty_close
> I'd like to get Alan's opinion on whether he considers the change in
> pty.c safe.
I considered it a while ago when trying to work out removing the BKL from
this path. After much head banging and an overwhelming desire to go and
get drunk instead I concluded it wasn't possible to tell by analysis.
So I ack this patch - it's the only way to find out 8)
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists