[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7385.1276829872@jrobl>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:57:52 +0900
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...cle.com>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] d_ino considered harmful
Andreas Dilger:
> As the name implies, it is very extN specific. For Lustre 2.0 we use a
> different method to get O(1) FID (inode number) to pathname(s)
> lookup. Each file stores an xattr with the {parent FID, filename}
> tuples for each link to the file, whenever an inode is created,
> linked, unlinked, or renamed.
Honestly speaking, this approach is the one which came to my mind when I
read David's mail. Andreas's approach and explanation is perfect as I
should admire.
Thank you
J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists