linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] backlight: fix 88pm860x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100618141058.9044b83d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:10:58 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: fix 88pm860x_bl macro collision

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:01:22 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:

> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> 
> Fix collision with kernel-supplied #define:
> 
> drivers/video/backlight/88pm860x_bl.c:24:1: warning: "CURRENT_MASK" redefined
> arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h:6:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/88pm860x_bl.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- lnx-2634-rc5.orig/drivers/video/backlight/88pm860x_bl.c
> +++ lnx-2634-rc5/drivers/video/backlight/88pm860x_bl.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>  #define MAX_BRIGHTNESS		(0xFF)
>  #define MIN_BRIGHTNESS		(0)
>  
> -#define CURRENT_MASK		(0x1F << 1)
> +#define CURRENT_BITMASK		(0x1F << 1)
>  
>  struct pm860x_backlight_data {
>  	struct pm860x_chip *chip;
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int pm860x_backlight_set(struct b
>  	if ((data->current_brightness == 0) && brightness) {
>  		if (data->iset) {
>  			ret = pm860x_set_bits(data->i2c, wled_idc(data->port),
> -					      CURRENT_MASK, data->iset);
> +					      CURRENT_BITMASK, data->iset);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				goto out;
>  		}

mutter.  "CURRENT_BITMASK" isn't a lot better.  And look at
"MAX_BRIGHTNESS" and "MIN_BRIGHTNESS" up there (five instances of
MAX_BRIGHTNESS in the tree).

Just because a definition resides in a .c file doesn't mena that it's
"private"!  We should be more defensive about these things.  And
picking better identifiers gets you more ctags-friendliness for free.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/