[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100617210859.40e024a1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:08:59 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, yanmin.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tmpfs: Make tmpfs scalable with percpu_counter
for used blocks
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:35:51 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
> > __struct shmem_sb_info {
> > __ __ __ __unsigned long max_blocks; __ /* How many blocks are allowed */
> > - __ __ __ unsigned long free_blocks; __/* How many are left for allocation */
> > + __ __ __ struct percpu_counter used_blocks; __/* How many are allocated */
>
> Just a nitpick.
> Why do you change free_blocks and used_blocks?
> I think we can use free_blocks following as.
>
> ex)
> if (percpu_counter_compare(&sbinfo->free_blocks, 0))
See previous lengthy discussion ;)
If we count free_blocks then we need to alter the value of free_blocks
in remount_fs, and reinitialising distributed counters on-the-fly is
ugly.
I suppose we could have done it by doing a large add or sub in
remount_fs, and keeping track of the exact value of free_blocks
elsewhere in the superblock, but it's far simpler this way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists