linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Clean up and speed up the localversion logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:25:00 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Nico Schottelius <nico-linuxsetlocalversion@...ottelius.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Clean up and speed up the localversion logic

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 04:05:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Michal Marek wrote:
> 
> > Now that we run scripts/setlocalversion during every build, it makes
> > sense to move all the localversion logic there. This cleans up the
> > toplevel Makefile and also makes sure that the script is called only
> > once in 'make prepare' (previously, it would be called every time due to
> > a variable expansion in an ifneq statement). No user-visible change is
> > intended, unless one runs the setlocalversion script directly.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Nico Schottelius <nico-linuxsetlocalversion@...ottelius.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
> > ---
> > 
> > I tried to test this in various scenarios, but if anyone of you could give
> > it a try, that would be great. The patch is against 2.6.35-rc3.
> > 
> 
> I agree it would be better to move this to scripts/setlocalversion, thanks 
> for looking into it.  I'll put this into my build cycles and see if it 
> causes any issues in my workflow that is known to be good with 2.6.35-rc3.  
> Since this is 2.6.36 material, it seems like we have some time.

No, I am sorry, it is not .36 material as the building on remote box was
messed up in .35 cycle.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/