[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100618004708.GZ6590@dastard>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:47:08 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Elder <aelder@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: Make fiemap works with sparse file.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 04:53:19PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> On 06/14/2010 08:29 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > I just had a thought - if you want to avoid holes being reported to
> > fiemap, then add a BMV_IF_NO_HOLES flag to xfs_getbmap() and skip
> > holes in the mappin gloop when this flag is set. That will make
> > fiemap fill in the full number of extents without hacking the
> > extent count...
> Here is the updated one. I have used BVM_IF_NO_HOLES in xfs_getbmap
> to skip increasing index 'cur_ext'. It is a bit ugly, see my commit
> log. I guess maybe we can add another flag in xfs_bmapi so that it
> don't even give us the holes?
No need...
>
> Regards,
> Tao
>
> From cee1765ffd3e2b003b837666b4620b5107ed9ddd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:14:22 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH v3] xfs: Make fiemap works with sparse file.
>
> In xfs_vn_fiemap, we set bvm_count to fi_extent_max + 1 and want
> to return fi_extent_max extents, but actually it won't work for
> a sparse file. The reason is that in xfs_getbmap we will
> calculate holes and set it in 'out', while out is malloced by
> bmv_count(fi_extent_max+1) which didn't consider holes. So in the
> worst case, if 'out' vector looks like
> [hole, extent, hole, extent, hole, ... hole, extent, hole],
> we will only return half of fi_extent_max extents.
>
> This patch add a new parameter BMV_IF_NO_HOLES for bvm_iflags.
> So with this flags, we don't use our 'out' in xfs_getbmap for
> a hole. The solution is a bit ugly by just don't increasing
> index of 'out' vector. I felt that it is not easy to skip it
> at the very beginning since we have the complicated check and
> some function like xfs_getbmapx_fix_eof_hole to adjust 'out'.
... because I think we can safely skip xfs_getbmapx_fix_eof_hole()
it only modifies the hole. Hence just adding a check after the
attribute fork end check (which needs to detect a hole to terminate)
should be fine: e.g something like:
if (map[i].br_startblock == HOLESTARTBLOCK &&
whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK) {
/* came to the end of attribute fork */
out[cur_ext].bmv_oflags |= BMV_OF_LAST;
goto out_free_map;
}
+ if (map[i].br_startblock == HOLESTARTBLOCK &&
+ (iflags & BMV_IF_NO_HOLES)) {
+ memset(&out[cur_ext], 0, sizeof(out[cur_ext]));
+ continue;
+ }
Should work and avoid the worst of the ugliness.
The rest of the patch looks fine.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists