[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin-lj5ZgtcvJhWcNiMuWSCQ39N8mqe_2fm8DDVR@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 15:25:16 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: fengguang.wu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [31/31] HWPOISON: Add a madvise() injector for soft page
offlining
Hi Andi,
Thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:36:28PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>> Hi Andi,
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Process based injection is much easier to handle for test programs,
>> > who can first bring a page into a specific state and then test.
>> > So add a new MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE to soft offline a page, similar
>> > to the existing hard offline injector.
>>
>> I see that this made its way into 2.6.33. Could you write a short
>> piece on it for the madvise.2 man page?
>
> Also fixed the previous snippet slightly.
(thanks)
> commit edb43354f0ffc04bf4f23f01261f9ea9f43e0d3d
> Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Sat Jun 19 15:19:28 2010 +0200
>
> MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/man2/madvise.2 b/man2/madvise.2
> index db29feb..9dccd97 100644
> --- a/man2/madvise.2
> +++ b/man2/madvise.2
> @@ -154,7 +154,15 @@ processes.
> This operation may result in the calling process receiving a
> .B SIGBUS
> and the page being unmapped.
> -This feature is intended for memory testing.
> +This feature is intended for testing of memory error handling code.
> +This feature is only available if the kernel was configured with
> +.BR CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE .
> +.TP
> +.BR MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE " (Since Linux 2.6.33)
> +Soft offline a page. This will result in the memory of the page
> +being copied to a new page and original page be offlined. The operation
Can you explain the term "offlined" please.
> +should be transparent to the calling process.
Does "should be transparent" mean "is normally invisible"?
Thanks,
Michael
> +This feature is intended for testing of memory error handling code.
> This feature is only available if the kernel was configured with
> .BR CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE .
> .TP
>
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface" http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists