linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] pid_ns_prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100619190840.GA3424@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:08:40 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] pid_ns_prepare_proc/unshare cleanups

On 06/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I only try to discuss the idea to break the circular reference.

I don't know what I have missed, but this looks really right to me.
Besides, we have yet another problem: proc_flush_task()->mntput()
is just wrong. Consider the multithreaded execing init.

I am going to simplify, test, and send the fix which moves mntput()
into free_pid_ns() paths.

But first of all I think we should cleanup the pid_ns_prepare_proc()
logic. Imho, this code is really ugly. Please see the patches.

The last one, 4/4, is orthogonal to other changes.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/