[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100619042534.GA16217@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:25:34 -0400
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] block: don't allocate a payload for discard request
On Fri, Jun 18 2010 at 10:59am -0400,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Allocating a fixed payload for discard requests always was a horrible hack,
> and it's not coming to byte us when adding support for discard in DM/MD.
>
> So change the code to leave the allocation of a payload to the lowlevel
> driver. Unfortunately that means we'll need another hack, which allows
> us to update the various block layer length fields indicating that we
> have a payload. Instead of hiding this in sd.c, which we already partially
> do for UNMAP support add a documented helper in the core block layer for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
I've built on your patch to successfully implement discard support for
DM (this includes splitting discards that span targets; only the linear
and striped DM targets are supported so far).
The patchset is still a work in progress but is available here (against
2.6.34 at the moment):
http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/patches/dm-discard/latest/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists