[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fx0jo0z6.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:55:41 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
>
> Wouldn't that be better served by cpu_stop?
No the error handling has to be able to sleep to take VM
locks. That's the whole point its handed off to a
workqueue. Otherwise it could be done directly.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists