linux-kernel - Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100619092758.GH18946@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:27:58 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andy Walls <awalls@...metrocast.net>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeff@...zik.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	cl@...ux-foundation.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, johannes@...solutions.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: Overview of concurrency managed workqueue

> Hmmm... yeah, adding it isn't hard.  I'm just a bit skeptical how
> useful it would be.  Having only single user would be a bit silly.

Why? If it's an important user...

> Can you think of anything else which could benefit from high priority
> queueing?

Over time we'll get more error handling, e.g. advanced NMI handling.
Maybe it could be useful for thermal handling too which is a similar
situation.

To be honest I would prefer if there aren't that many more users,
the more users the less useful it becomes.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/