linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][REGRESSION] um: CONFIG_STATIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTim1X5nlYtFxajkWCJOPubEkOGciqlCWeGDKQdQV@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:54:02 +0200
From:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tabbott@...lice.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, stable@...nel.org,
	maurer@...s.caltech.edu
Subject: Re: [RESEND][REGRESSION] um: CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y broken

On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 00:23, richard -rw- weinberger
> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 19:50, richard -rw- weinberger
>>> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 17:22, richard -rw- weinberger
>>>>> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>>>>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 15:49, richard -rw- weinberger
>>>>>>> <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Andrew, Linus, Jeff, ... anyone?
>>>>>>>> Please apply this patch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is still broken. :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wanted to verify Tim's patch, but after enabling CONFIG_STATIC_LINK,
>>>>>>> it fails to link
>>>>>>> (with or without your patch):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW: Does CONFIG_STATIC_LINK work for you when you revert commit
>>>>>> 5d150a97f9391f5bcd7ba0d59d7a11c3de3cea80 (um: Clean up linker script
>>>>>> using standard macros)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Still the same linking errors ;-(
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you using a non-x86 environment?
>>>> Maybe CONFIG_STATIC_LINK is more broken than i thought.
>>>
>>> I'm using amd64 on Ubuntu 10.04.
>>>
>>
>> Can please you test this patch?
>> http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/03cd264b00551949?pli=1
>
> Matthew's patch fixes the linking problem for me.
>
> Interestingly, CONFIG_STATIC_LINK=y now boots fine for me, with and
> without Tim's patch?

Tim's patch fixes the issue on x86 and Matthew's patch fixes it on amd64.
I'll combine both patches and test them also on some other archs.

-- 
Cheers,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/