[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100620215646.GB17517@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:56:46 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Unshare support for the pid namespace.
On 06/20, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
>
> > And. I do not think these series can fix the discussed problems. ns->dead
> > definitely can't, no?
>
> I'm am fairly confident that we have the signal sending races fixed so
> we can reasonably expect having sent SIGKILL to all processes in a pid
> namespace
Sorry, didn't notice this part...
Which races? I am talking about the current problems with pid_ns_release_proc(),
we have at least 3 bugs, from the 2/2 changelog:
- Nobody does mntput() if copy_process() fails after
pid_ns_prepare_proc().
- proc_flush_task() checks upid->nr == 1 to verify we are init,
this is wrong if a multi-threaded init does exec.
- As Louis pointed out, this namespace can have the detached
EXIT_DEAD tasks which can use ns->proc_mnt after this mntput().
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists