[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C1E9752.8040508@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:33:54 -0700
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...ba.org>
CC: linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6 v2]cifs Fix warnings variables set but not used
>> /* since paths are not looked up by component - the parent
>> directories are presumed to be good here */
>> renew_parental_timestamps(direntry);
>> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
>> index 75541af..73e540b 100644
>> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
>> @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ static int cifs_partialpagewrite(struct page *page, unsigned from, unsigned to)
>> int rc = -EFAULT;
>> int bytes_written = 0;
>> struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
>> - struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon;
>> + struct cifsTconInfo *pTcon __attribute__((unused));
>
> This variable can just be removed (along with the spot where it gets
> set later).
>
>> struct inode *inode;
>> struct cifsFileInfo *open_file;
>>
>
>
one thing I want to make sure of before sending this out, is with file.c
if I remove *pTcon another warning shows up:
CC [M] fs/cifs/file.o
fs/cifs/file.c: In function 'cifs_partialpagewrite':
fs/cifs/file.c:1314:23: warning: variable 'cifs_sb' set but not used
with the original patch I had removed this as well, should I do this or
is this not a good idea?
Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists