[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006201324170.4366@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:24:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/hid: Eliminate a double lock
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
The path around the loop ends with the lock held, so the call to mutex_lock
is moved before the beginning of the loop.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@locked@
expression E1;
position p;
@@
read_lock(E1@p,...);
@r exists@
expression x <= locked.E1;
expression locked.E1;
expression E2;
identifier lock;
position locked.p,p1,p2;
@@
*lock@p1 (E1@p,...);
... when != E1
when != \(x = E2\|&x\)
*lock@p2 (E1,...);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
Compile tested only.
drivers/hid/hid-debug.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
index c940267..850d02a 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-debug.c
@@ -949,8 +949,8 @@ static ssize_t hid_debug_events_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
int ret = 0, len;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
+ mutex_lock(&list->read_mutex);
while (ret == 0) {
- mutex_lock(&list->read_mutex);
if (list->head == list->tail) {
add_wait_queue(&list->hdev->debug_wait, &wait);
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists