[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lja9q0b1.fsf@linux-g6p1.site>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:51:46 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch/sh/mm: Eliminate a double lock
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:24:54 +0200 (CEST), Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> The function begins and ends with a read_lock. The latter is changed to a
> read_unlock.
I think we've been quite lucky here so far, in that no one takes a
write_lock after we've double-read-locked pmb_rwlock.
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists