linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:01:32 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	tytso@....edu
Cc:	markgross@...gnar.org, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, mark gross <640e9920@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:42:49 -0400
tytso@....edu wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:22:34PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 
> > You seem desperate to just throw it at Linus - you have been all along
> > before the discussion, during it and now: but I don't understand why ?
> 
> Why are you so afraid to let Linus make the call?  He's the benevolent
> dictator, isn't he?

I don't mind him laughing at it. I'm just curious why you've tried to
short circuit the more general discussion repeatedly - even right at the
start.

> It doesn't look like progress is being made here.

On suspend blockers no - on some of the real problems yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/