[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92911.1277086573@localhost>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:16:13 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: allow restriction of ptrace scope
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:52:11 +1000, James Morris said:
> Note that people using SELinux or AppArmor already have the ability to
> restrict ptrace, and they would thus not need to stack this function if it
> were in a separate LSM.
That's assuming they can figure out how to write and integrate the required
policy changes. Looking inside selinux-policy-3.8.3-4.fc14.src.rpm from Fedora
Rawhide: (Holy cow, there's a .git tree in that tarball - no wonder it's 20M in
size).
% cd serefpolicy-3.8.3/policy/modules; wc -l */* | grep total
135967 total
135kloc of policy that probably nobody in your shop really understands. At
that point, writing something that stacks starts sounding really enticing.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists