[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277194574.3637.13.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:16:14 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>,
"Gary.Mohr@...l.com" <Gary.Mohr@...l.com>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Maynard Johnson <mpjohn@...ibm.com>,
Carl Love <carll@...ibm.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc] Describe events in a structured way via sysfs
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 16:04 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> > Which really just means that whoever writes the tracepoint needs to
> > provide a struct device for where to put it (at least in the case of
> > driver tracepoints), and then ideally some description of the device
> > also gets put into the ringbuffer.
>
> I'm not familiar with tracepoint code. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> Do you mean that, for example, if iwlwifi_dev_ioread32 event is traced,
> then the "device" info will get put into the ftrace ringbuffer?
No, right now it doesn't.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists