linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:22:01 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@...ibm.com>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

Hi Al,

After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

fs/9p/vfs_inode.c: In function 'v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl':
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:1056: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_setattr'

Caused by commit 463942d48d7f05812f0d6426dd8051ff53ea24a3 ("9p: Implement
client side of setattr for 9P2000.L protocol") from the v9fs tree
interacting with commit 3d9bf66940b6001a30aa30d5ac9f816326d9b3a0 ("remove
inode_setattr") from the vfs tree.

I have applied the following patch (using the changes in the above vfs
tree commit as a guide) as a merge fix for today, but am not sure if it
is correct.  I assume that this (or something similar) could be applied
to the v9fs tree now - is that correct Christoph?

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:15:01 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] v9fs: fixup for inode_setattr being removed

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
index f027a42..2ec7bfa 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -1052,10 +1052,19 @@ static int v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr)
 		return PTR_ERR(fid);
 
 	retval = p9_client_setattr(fid, &p9attr);
-	if (retval >= 0)
-		retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr);
+	if (retval < 0)
+		return retval;
 
-	return retval;
+	if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) &&
+	    iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) {
+		retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size);
+		if (retval)
+			return retval;
+	}
+
+	setattr_copy(dentry->d_inode, iattr);
+	mark_inode_dirty(dentry->d_inode);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.7.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/