linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: core: no need to track irq flags in bm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C21034C.7060309@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:39:08 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Philippe De Muyter <phdm@...qel.be>
CC:	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firewire: core: no need to track irq flags in	bm_work

Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> Thanks for the clear explanation, and sorry for your wasted time.

Oh, no problem.  It helps that somebody actually looks at these patches
and asks if something looks illogical.  I for one am on record to have
posted patches that got things backwards. :-)
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- -==- =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/