[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201006230854.00441.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:53:58 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
Cc: "dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] param sysfs oops (simple, leaky) fix, bool arrays fix
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:20:11 am Phil Carmody wrote:
> Artem's passed the baton over to me to investigate, so I've reviewed
> and back-ported the last known version of your patchset. I'm happy to
> report that the 100% reproducable leak that we were seeing before
> cannot be reproduced. As expected, given review of the code. I have
> not been able to test the final driver-specific patches from your
> patchset, but up to and including
>
> [PATCH 12/18] param: simple locking for sysfs-writable charp parameters
>
> they can all have a:
>
> Tested-by: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
>
> I'm quite interested to see these pushed into the mainline so that I
> can cherry-pick final versions for our internal tree, do you have any
> schedule for that?
Thanks, Phil, I've added that. Testing is always good!
The patches are sitting in linux-next now, ready for the next merge window
(ie. 2.6.36)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists