[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C205323.3010509@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 23:07:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
CC: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, x86@...nel.org,
584846@...s.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#584846: Detects only 64MB and fails to boot on Intel Green
City board if e820 hooked by GRUB2
On 06/21/2010 10:22 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> How might I diagnose this further? What might cause Linux to refuse to
> use the e820 and e801 results provided by GRUB, but accept the ones
> provided by the BIOS?
>
This is interesting... you apparently have a ACPI 3-style e820 BIOS as
evidenced by the [1] markers, but Grub presents it as legacy style.
Now, the kernel shouldn't care, but this at least gives a clue.
Something that might be worthwhile is to add printf's to the kernel's
e820-parsing routine (in arch/x86/boot/e820.c) and figure out why it
doesn't like the output. It's a bit strange that meminfo would produce
sensible-looking output (well, legal, at least; presenting a two-byte
range is rather beyond crazy, and so forth) and the kernel wouldn't
accept it, as the code is intentionally very similar.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists