[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C206D8B.4080105@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:00:11 +0200
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, zhiteng.huang@...el.com,
tim.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] ara virt interface of perf to support kvm guest
os statistics collection in guest os
On 06/22/10 09:55, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:47 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>> Besides the para virt perf interface, I'm also considering the direct exposition
>> of PMU hardware to guest os.
>
> NAK NAK NAK NAK, we've been over that, its not going to happen, full
> stop!
>
> Use MSR read/write traps and host perf to emulate the hardware. In some
> cases we could allow the reads without trap but that's a later
> optimization.
I believe whats meant here is a PMU compatible interface which is
partially emulated. Not a handover of the PMU.
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists