[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100623144307.GB30526@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:43:08 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Matt Carlson <mcarlson@...adcom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-2.6.35] virtio-pci: disable msi at startup
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 05:21:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/23/2010 04:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>
>>> Why doesn't a device reset result in msi being cleared?
>>>
>> This is not a standard function reset. This is virtio specific
>> command. So it only clears virtio registers.
>>
>
> I see. We should implement FLR in qemu.
We can do this. Or PM reset. however ...
> If we don't already do so, we
> should probably FLR anything that moves when a kexec kernel starts.
Probably only whatever we want to use. But whether this will make it
more, or less robust, is an open question.
>>> Shouldn't a reset be equivalent to power cycling?
>>>
>> If we did this, driver would need to restore registers
>> such as BAR etc.
>>
>
> We could save/restore the registers we care about.
It seems easier to clear registers we care about. It's also too late
now: changing behaviour will break old drivers.
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists