lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:32:24 -0400
From:	Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@...il.com>
To:	Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
CC:	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/10] cifs: add mount option to enable local caching

On 6/22/2010 11:25 AM, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> Add a mount option 'fsc' to enable local caching on CIFS.
>
> As the cifs-utils (userspace) changes are not done yet, this patch enables
> 'fsc' by default to assist testing.
>    
[...]
> @@ -1332,6 +1336,8 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(char *options, const char *devname,
>   			printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: Mount option noac not "
>   				"supported. Instead set "
>   				"/proc/fs/cifs/LookupCacheEnabled to 0\n");
> +		} else if (strnicmp(data, "fsc", 3) == 0) {
> +			vol->fsc = true;
>   		} else
>   			printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: Unknown mount option %s\n",
>   						data);
> @@ -2405,6 +2411,8 @@ static void setup_cifs_sb(struct smb_vol *pvolume_info,
>   		cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags |= CIFS_MOUNT_OVERR_GID;
>   	if (pvolume_info->dynperm)
>   		cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags |= CIFS_MOUNT_DYNPERM;
> +	if (pvolume_info->fsc)
> +		cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags |= CIFS_MOUNT_FSCACHE;
>   	if (pvolume_info->direct_io) {
>   		cFYI(1, "mounting share using direct i/o");
>   		cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags |= CIFS_MOUNT_DIRECT_IO;
>    
I reworked the CIFS mount option parsing a while back; I'm not sure 
whether that patch was going to be in the 2.6.35 tree or not (the window 
just opened, didn't it?).

Jeff, Steve, can you confirm if that patch is going to be in 2.6.35?

Patch refs: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/53059/  and 
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/53674/



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ