linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: Don't count_vm_events for discard bio in submit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100623124046.4dec96d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:40:46 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Don't count_vm_events for discard bio in
 submit_bio.

On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:24:51 +0800
Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com> wrote:

> In submit_bio, we count vm events by check READ/WRITE.
> But actually DISCARD_NOBARRIER also has the WRITE flag set.
> It looks as if in blkdev_issue_discard, we also add a
> page as the payload and the bio_has_data check isn't enough.
> So add another check for discard bio.
> 
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index f84cce4..a725602 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ void submit_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio)
>  	 * If it's a regular read/write or a barrier with data attached,
>  	 * go through the normal accounting stuff before submission.
>  	 */
> -	if (bio_has_data(bio)) {
> +	if (bio_has_data(bio) && !(rw & BIO_RW_DISCARD)) {
>  		if (rw & WRITE) {
>  			count_vm_events(PGPGOUT, count);
>  		} else {

Yes, that's a buglet.

Note that Christoph's "[PATCH, RFC] block: don't allocate a payload for
discard request" will fix it in a better way.  That patch is in
linux-next now, but I expect it will be taken out again (quickly,
please) because Mike has found a number of problems with it.  

Your patch looks like a decent temporary fix for mainline, and a
permanent one for -stable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/