linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/1] pid_ns: move pid_ns_release_proc() from proc_flush_task() to zap_pid_ns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100623203652.GA25298@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:36:52 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] pid_ns: move pid_ns_release_proc() from
	proc_flush_task() to zap_pid_ns_processes()

On 06/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> But first of all I think we should cleanup the pid_ns_prepare_proc()
> logic. Imho, this code is really ugly. Please see the patches.
>
> The last one, 4/4, is orthogonal to other changes.

And the last one on top of this series, before I go away from this
thread ;)

Since my further fixes were not approved, I think at least it makes
sense to cleanup pid_ns_release_proc() logic a bit.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/