linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] perf: Per PMU disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:09:40 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	paulus <paulus@...ba.org>,
	stephane eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@...il.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] perf: Per PMU disable

On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 18:21 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 09:11:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 04:14 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 06:00:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > +static void armpmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > >  {
> > > > +static void powerpc_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > >  {
> > > > +static void fsl_emb_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > >  {
> > > > +static void sh_pmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > > +{
> > > > +static void sparc_pmu_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > >  {
> > > > +static void x86_pmu_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > > >  {
> > > 
> > > 
> > > These namings are really bad. Why not just using pmu once
> > > in each names? x86_pmu_enable, etc...
> > 
> > Because some of those were already taken:
> > 
> > static const struct pmu pmu = {
> >         .enable         = x86_pmu_enable,
> >         .disable        = x86_pmu_disable,
> 
> 
> Then those should be renamed into x86_event_enable or so. 
> 
well, possibly, but the patches were large enough already.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/