linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: memrar: Moved memrar_allocator struct into memrar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:17:49 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Henri Häkkinen <henuxd@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, ossama.othman@...el.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	alan@...ux.intel.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: memrar: Moved memrar_allocator struct into
 memrar_allocator.c

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:40:27PM +0300, Henri Häkkinen wrote:
> Forward declared memrar_allocator in memrar_allocator.h and moved it
> to memrar_allocator.c file.  Implemented memrar_allocator_capacity(),
> memrar_allocator_largest_free_area(), memrar_allocoator_lock() and
> memrar_allocator_unlock().

Shouldn't this be more than just one single patch?

Please only do one thing per patch.

Care to respin these and take into consideration the other comments for
this patch?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/