[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTintzv8areadp7DJO5qdq_V6ZdTmZb5MNnCWzzDs@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:28:18 -0400
From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #16054] UML broken for CONFIG_SLAB
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> From: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 06:48:55PM -0400
> make mrproper
>
> and just to make sure no arch_hweight stuff is left, do
>
> grep -EriIn 'x86.*hweight\.h' arch/um/
>
> You shouldn't be getting any matches. If you do, than try to find out
> why you do because all those intermediary *.o.cmd files shouldn't
> contain any hweight-include files from arch/x86/.
>
Ok. That solves the cfq related crash due to hweight stuff. However
the second issue - UM is broken for CONFIG_SLAB still exists.
So I think we can keep the bug open.
Thanks
Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists