linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH v7 01/19] Add a new structure for skb buffer from external.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B21F58CD9A@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:09:40 +0800
From:	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>
To:	"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"jdike@...ux.intel.com" <jdike@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v7 01/19] Add a new structure for skb buffer from
	external.


> 3) As I have mentioned above, with this idea, netdev_alloc_skb() will
> allocate 
> as usual, the data pointed by skb->data will be copied into the first
> guest buffer. 
> That means we should reserve sufficient room in guest buffer. For PS
> mode 
> supported driver (for example ixgbe), the room will be more than 128.
> After 128bytes, 
> we will put the first frag data. Look into virtio-net.c the function
> page_to_skb() 
> and receive_mergeable(), that means we should modify guest virtio-net
> driver to 
> compute the offset as the parameter for skb_set_frag().
> 
> How do you think about this? Attached is a patch to how to modify the
> guest driver. 
> I reserve 512 bytes as an example, and transfer the header len of the
> skb in hdr->hdr_len. 
> 
Xiaohui & Herbert:
	Mixing copy of head & 0-copy of bulk data imposes additional challange to find the guest buffer. The backend driver may be unable to find a spare guest buffer from virtqueue at that time which may block the receiving process then.
	Can't we completely eliminate netdev_alloc_skb here? Assigning guest buffer at this time makes life much easier.
Thx, Eddie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/