[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100623093638R.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:38:27 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
davem@...emloft.net, mchan@...adcom.com, vapier@...too.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bnx2 fails to compile on parisc because of missing
get_dma_ops()
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:26:04 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> > As I wrote, there is only one user of this API and we can remove it
> > easily. Then I'm not sure it's worth fixing dma_is_consistent() in
> > many architectures. I prefer to add this to
> > feature-removal-schedule.txt to see if driver writers oppose.
>
> Let me check our two drivers: lasi and 53c700; they're the only ones we
> support on the architecture that can't do any coherence. I think we
> don't need to tell because the dma_sync_cache calls which replace
> coherent memory handling are indirected on the platform so we don't need
> a global dma_is_coherent() flag.
There is only one place where 53c700 uses dma_is_consistent() (lasi
doesn't use it):
BUG_ON(!dma_is_consistent(hostdata->dev, pScript) && L1_CACHE_BYTES < dma_get_cache_alignment());
I think that we can remove the above checking since the existing
parisc systems that can't allocate coherent memory pass this checking.
53c700 and lasi call dma_cache_sync() unconditionally so we can live
without dma_is_consistent().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists