lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100624063630.GB3016@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:36:30 -0700
From:	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pid_ns: move pid_ns_release_proc() from
	proc_flush_task() to zap_pid_ns_processes()

Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...hat.com] wrote:
| This is mostly cleanup and optimization, but also fixes the bug.
| 
| proc_flush_task() checks upid->nr == 1 to detect the case when
| a sub-namespace exits. However, this doesn't work in case when
| a multithreaded init execs and calls release_task(old_leader),
| the old leader has the same pid 1.
| 
| Move pid_ns_release_proc() to zap_pid_ns_processes(), it is called
| when we know for sure that init is exiting.

Hmm, I almost agreed, but have a question :-)

Yes, we know that the container-init is exiting. But if its parent (in
the parent ns) waits on it and calls release_task(), won't we call
proc_flush_task_mnt() on this container-init ? This would happen after
dropping the mnt in zap_pid_ns_processes() no ?

At the time zap_pid_ns_processes() is called, the container-init is still
not in EXIT_ZOMBIE state right ? (Or does your statement below include
EXIT_DEAD and EXIT_ZOMBIE tasks ?)

| 
| Note: with or without this change this mntput() can happen before the
| EXIT_DEAD tasks not visible to do_wait() have passed proc_flush_task().
| We need more fixes.
| 

Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ