[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277362073.1875.839.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 08:47:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 14:43 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Hi, Peter,
> I fact I uses exactly the similar method in my patches, just trigger it
> with soft_irq instead of IRQ. Please take a look at
> nmi_return_notifier_schedule in
But then why still use softirq? Once you have this its completely
useless.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists