[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1277363993.1875.847.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:19:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 15:04 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Yes. NMI is there from 8259 age.
But do we really care about such systems?
> That is possible. But in NO_HZ system, we have no tick to rely on.
Of course you have, you can delay the NO_HZ state when there's pending
callbacks, that's all of 1 line.
> soft_irq is better here, because it will be triggered for any interrupt.
Well, you can do the callbacks from irq_exit() as well, that's no
problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists