linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100624102725.GA578@basil.fritz.box>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:27:25 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H.PeterA" <"nvin hpa"@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq_work

> True, but I really don't like the softirq thing, and I really don't care
> about !APIC machines, I probably couldn't buy one if I wanted to and its
> not like we have good MCE support for them now, so who cares.

In theory you can run a machine with good MCE support in non APIC single
CPU mode. It wouldn't make much sense, but you could do it.

Anyways, I don't think we need a lot of effort to handle this case,
but it would be better to not explicitely break it either.

That's why the timer fallback in the original code was fine, this 
basically never happens and even if there is a 5s delay from tickless
that's fine.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/